CA250: Mass Comm at Notre Dame College
Immerse yourself in the energetic, innovative and potentially illegal world of mash-up media with RiP: A Remix Manifesto. Let web activist Brett Gaylor and musician Greg Gillis, better known as Girl Talk, serve as your digital tour guides on a probing investigation into how culture builds upon culture in the information age.
Biomedical engineer turned live-performance sensation Girl Talk, has received immense commercial and critical success for his mind-blowing sample-based music. Utilizing technical expertise and a ferocious creative streak, Girl Talk repositions popular music to create a wild and edgy dialogue between artists from all genres and eras. But are his practices legal? Do his methods of frenetic appropriation embrace collaboration in its purest sense? Or are they infractions of creative integrity and violations of copyright?
Click on the picture to watch the film.

Immerse yourself in the energetic, innovative and potentially illegal world of mash-up media with RiP: A Remix Manifesto. Let web activist Brett Gaylor and musician Greg Gillis, better known as Girl Talk, serve as your digital tour guides on a probing investigation into how culture builds upon culture in the information age.

Biomedical engineer turned live-performance sensation Girl Talk, has received immense commercial and critical success for his mind-blowing sample-based music. Utilizing technical expertise and a ferocious creative streak, Girl Talk repositions popular music to create a wild and edgy dialogue between artists from all genres and eras. But are his practices legal? Do his methods of frenetic appropriation embrace collaboration in its purest sense? Or are they infractions of creative integrity and violations of copyright?

Click on the picture to watch the film.

Immerse yourself in the energetic, innovative and potentially illegal world of mash-up media with RiP: A Remix Manifesto. Let web activist Brett Gaylor and musician Greg Gillis, better known as Girl Talk, serve as your digital tour guides on a probing investigation into how culture builds upon culture in the information age.

Biomedical engineer turned live-performance sensation Girl Talk, has received immense commercial and critical success for his mind-blowing sample-based music. Utilizing technical expertise and a ferocious creative streak, Girl Talk repositions popular music to create a wild and edgy dialogue between artists from all genres and eras. But are his practices legal? Do his methods of frenetic appropriation embrace collaboration in its purest sense? Or are they infractions of creative integrity and violations of copyright?

A bare behind costs $1.4 million and the F- and S- words are off-limits (but only sometimes): welcome to the confusing world of FCC regulations.
George Carlin would have had a field day with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision on television indecency. The late comic’s famous “Seven Filthy Words” monologue prompted the Court’s 1978 ruling that regulation of indecent speech on publicly owned TV and radio airwaves was OK under the First Amendment.
But despite a media landscape radically reshaped by cable TV and the Internet, the court on June 21 refused to alter its 34-year precedent, finding only that the FCC failed to give adequate notice to broadcasters of rules tweaks that resulted in sanctions for airing Charlotte Ross’ naked rear on ABC’s NYPD Blue in 2003 and swear words by Cherand Nicole Richie during awards shows on Fox in 2002 and 2003.
So now the agency, which polices naughty content only after someone objects and issues fines at its discretion, faces a backlog of about 1.4 million complaints that have accumulated during the nine years the Fox case was pending. And because the Supreme Court and FCC have refused to articulate a clear indecency framework, attorneys say Hollywood still doesn’t have a clear idea of what broadcasters can and can’t show before 10 p.m. (the rules don’t apply to cable or late-night). “It’s going to be difficult, and it’s going to be confusing,” says John Stephens, an L.A. media lawyer. Still, using precedent and the court’s recent ruling, THR can break down where the lines are being drawn.
Profanity
The FCC has declared “f—” and “shit” presumptively indecent, even if uttered as “fleeting expletives” rather than, as Carlin chose to do, repeatedly. “F— inherently has a sexual connotation and thus falls within the scope of our indecency definition,” said the commission in a 2006 order.
Broadcasters, though, say the FCC has not been a model of consistency with regard to language. In fining a San Mateo, Calif., public TV station for airing profanities during a broadcast of Martin Scorsese’s PBS documentary series The Blues, the commission said the two words were “likely to shock the viewer and disturb the peace and quiet of the home.” But it allowed nearly all of Carlin’s dirty words to be used during unedited broadcasts of the Oscar-winning war epic Saving Private Ryan. Deleting offensive words “would have altered the nature of the artistic work and diminished the power, realism and immediacy of the film experience for viewers,” said the commission.
Sex Talk
Fortunately for CBS’ 2 Broke Girls, references to anatomical terms such as “penis,” “vagina” and “testicles” are not indecent. The FCC also denied a complaint over the use of “dick” and “dickhead” in an episode of NYPD Blue, finding they “do not have the same level of offensiveness as the ‘F-word’ or ‘S-word.’ “
But FCC decisions suggest explicit explorations of sexual anatomy are not permissible. In 2004, it fined Clear Channel over Bubba the Love Sponge’s radio show, on which the host discussed the large size of his “balls” as a singer and chorus sang about them.
Sex Acts
Howard Stern racked up about $2.5 million in fines from 1990 to 2004. Suggesting anal sex with a castmember’s wife during a 2003 broadcast landed the shock jock in trouble. “[I]t is clear that the material was designed to shock and pander,” concluded the FCC in fining the program.
Other sexual behaviors likewise have met with commission disapproval, including sex in public places, a teen orgy depicted on CBS’ Without a Trace, masturbation and kissing a bare breast. Fox was fined $1.18 million for a 2003 episode of its reality series Married by America that featured strippers and castmembers engaging in sexual conduct.
The FCC, though, approved a sexually suggestive scene on NBC’s Will & Grace in which Will adjusts Grace’s breasts in her dress. And it ruled in a 2006 “omnibus” order that an explicit discussion of teen-sex practices on The Oprah Winfrey Show was “designed to inform viewers about an important topic.”
Nudity
Frontal or rear nudity (male or female) still is prohibited on broadcast TV, as the flap overJanet Jackson’s 2004 Super Bowl halftime-show “wardrobe malfunction” evidenced. The NYPD Blue depiction of Ross’ naked rear “is titillating and shocking,” said the FCC in imposing a $1.4 million fine against ABC.
Violence
Oddly, violent material falls outside the FCC’s indecency regulation. So the line on what’s too graphic for a CSI murder isn’t clear. But, notes Dennis Wharton, spokesman for the National Association of Broadcasters, “Policing mechanisms are in place by networks and broadcasters.” The Sopranos reruns on A&E, for example, were edited to remove graphic violence. And Tim Winter, president of the Parents Television Council, says his group pressured CBS to drop reruns of Showtime’s Dexter during the 2007-08 writers strike. In the end, he says, “The way to success is talking to advertisers.”

A bare behind costs $1.4 million and the F- and S- words are off-limits (but only sometimes): welcome to the confusing world of FCC regulations.

George Carlin would have had a field day with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision on television indecency. The late comic’s famous “Seven Filthy Words” monologue prompted the Court’s 1978 ruling that regulation of indecent speech on publicly owned TV and radio airwaves was OK under the First Amendment.

But despite a media landscape radically reshaped by cable TV and the Internet, the court on June 21 refused to alter its 34-year precedent, finding only that the FCC failed to give adequate notice to broadcasters of rules tweaks that resulted in sanctions for airing Charlotte Ross’ naked rear on ABC’s NYPD Blue in 2003 and swear words by Cherand Nicole Richie during awards shows on Fox in 2002 and 2003.

So now the agency, which polices naughty content only after someone objects and issues fines at its discretion, faces a backlog of about 1.4 million complaints that have accumulated during the nine years the Fox case was pending. And because the Supreme Court and FCC have refused to articulate a clear indecency framework, attorneys say Hollywood still doesn’t have a clear idea of what broadcasters can and can’t show before 10 p.m. (the rules don’t apply to cable or late-night). “It’s going to be difficult, and it’s going to be confusing,” says John Stephens, an L.A. media lawyer. Still, using precedent and the court’s recent ruling, THR can break down where the lines are being drawn.

Profanity

The FCC has declared “f—” and “shit” presumptively indecent, even if uttered as “fleeting expletives” rather than, as Carlin chose to do, repeatedly. “F— inherently has a sexual connotation and thus falls within the scope of our indecency definition,” said the commission in a 2006 order.

Broadcasters, though, say the FCC has not been a model of consistency with regard to language. In fining a San Mateo, Calif., public TV station for airing profanities during a broadcast of Martin Scorsese’s PBS documentary series The Blues, the commission said the two words were “likely to shock the viewer and disturb the peace and quiet of the home.” But it allowed nearly all of Carlin’s dirty words to be used during unedited broadcasts of the Oscar-winning war epic Saving Private Ryan. Deleting offensive words “would have altered the nature of the artistic work and diminished the power, realism and immediacy of the film experience for viewers,” said the commission.

Sex Talk

Fortunately for CBS’ 2 Broke Girls, references to anatomical terms such as “penis,” “vagina” and “testicles” are not indecent. The FCC also denied a complaint over the use of “dick” and “dickhead” in an episode of NYPD Blue, finding they “do not have the same level of offensiveness as the ‘F-word’ or ‘S-word.’ “

But FCC decisions suggest explicit explorations of sexual anatomy are not permissible. In 2004, it fined Clear Channel over Bubba the Love Sponge’s radio show, on which the host discussed the large size of his “balls” as a singer and chorus sang about them.

Sex Acts

Howard Stern racked up about $2.5 million in fines from 1990 to 2004. Suggesting anal sex with a castmember’s wife during a 2003 broadcast landed the shock jock in trouble. “[I]t is clear that the material was designed to shock and pander,” concluded the FCC in fining the program.

Other sexual behaviors likewise have met with commission disapproval, including sex in public places, a teen orgy depicted on CBS’ Without a Trace, masturbation and kissing a bare breast. Fox was fined $1.18 million for a 2003 episode of its reality series Married by America that featured strippers and castmembers engaging in sexual conduct.

The FCC, though, approved a sexually suggestive scene on NBC’s Will & Grace in which Will adjusts Grace’s breasts in her dress. And it ruled in a 2006 “omnibus” order that an explicit discussion of teen-sex practices on The Oprah Winfrey Show was “designed to inform viewers about an important topic.”

Nudity

Frontal or rear nudity (male or female) still is prohibited on broadcast TV, as the flap overJanet Jackson’s 2004 Super Bowl halftime-show “wardrobe malfunction” evidenced. The NYPD Blue depiction of Ross’ naked rear “is titillating and shocking,” said the FCC in imposing a $1.4 million fine against ABC.

Violence

Oddly, violent material falls outside the FCC’s indecency regulation. So the line on what’s too graphic for a CSI murder isn’t clear. But, notes Dennis Wharton, spokesman for the National Association of Broadcasters, “Policing mechanisms are in place by networks and broadcasters.” The Sopranos reruns on A&E, for example, were edited to remove graphic violence. And Tim Winter, president of the Parents Television Council, says his group pressured CBS to drop reruns of Showtime’s Dexter during the 2007-08 writers strike. In the end, he says, “The way to success is talking to advertisers.”

Great piece in a recent Atlantic magazine looking back on the 40th anniversary of Carlin’s famous bit—

Forty years and a landmark Supreme Court decision have passed since Carlin first spoke out about the seven words you cannot say on television. But we’re still wrestling with the issues that Carlin raised with his monologue. How should the government define acceptable language? What can we learn from the 40th anniversary of the most famous, foul-mouthed comedic routine shortly before what could be the most substantial Supreme Court decision on profanity to date? 

More at http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/05/the-7-dirty-words-turn-40-but-theyre-still-dirty/257374/

On 12 December 1937, Mae West appeared on the Chase and Sanborn Hour with ventriloquist Edgar Bergen and his monocled knee-pal (dummy), Charlie McCarthy. Stars of stage and screen and airwaves, Bergen and McCarthy had a huge following, and West was keen to promote her latest film, Every Day’s a Holiday. She appeared in two sketches, including “The Garden of Eden” with Don Ameche, and a flirtatious banter with McCarthy. The announcer introduces the meeting as “the romantic battle of the century”, a contest of seduction which the dummy might just prove strong enough to resist. There follows a blistering back-and-forth, during which West describes Charlie as “all wood and a yard long”. This was too much for many listeners (though the studio audience found it hilarious), especially on a Sunday, and the Federal Communications Commission deemed it indecent. NBC banned West (you couldn’t even mention her name) from all their radio stations. She didn’t appear on radio until January 1950.

TIME magazine reports (June 29, 2012)—
In Feburary 2004, Justin Timberlake ripped off a piece of Janet Jackson’s clothing during a Superbowl halftime performance, exposing her bare breast to a TV audience of 90 million. The incident, famously euphemized as a “wardrobe malfunction,” shocked America and prompted an eight-year legal battle that has gone as far as the highest court in the nation.
But that’s where it stops. The Supreme Court announced Friday that it would not review the case — in which the CBS television network challenged a fine levied by the Federal Communications Commission for airing the momentary indecency — allowing a lower court’s cancellation of the fine to stand, SCOTUSblog reports.
The 9/16th of a second of nudity led to a lengthy series of legal appeals and re-appeals. At the time, the FCC had a formal policy of imposing fines for even the most fleeting instances of indecent words or images. In line with that policy, the agency fined CBS $550,000 — the largest fine ever levied against a television broadcaster.
CBS appealed on grounds that the FCC seemed fairly capricious as to when and how it enforced its policy on indecency, and would even change it without notice. The Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found in CBS’s favor.
The Court announced today that it would bypass review of the case, allowing the Third Circuit’s ruling to stand. Chief Justice John Roberts filed a separate opinion stating that he did not believe the FCC had actually changed its policy.
Roberts added that he found Timberlake’s explanation that the nudity was simply a “wardrobe malfunction” unconvincing. The claim that the exposure was a mistake “strained the credulity of the public,” Roberts said.
In a related case, the Supreme Court ruled last week to throw out FCC fines against Fox News and ABC for fleeting instances of indecent language, finding that the networks had not had fair notice of the nature of the fines. The Court effectively sidestepped the issue of whether the fines violate free speech rights.

TIME magazine reports (June 29, 2012)—

In Feburary 2004, Justin Timberlake ripped off a piece of Janet Jackson’s clothing during a Superbowl halftime performance, exposing her bare breast to a TV audience of 90 million. The incident, famously euphemized as a “wardrobe malfunction,” shocked America and prompted an eight-year legal battle that has gone as far as the highest court in the nation.

But that’s where it stops. The Supreme Court announced Friday that it would not review the case — in which the CBS television network challenged a fine levied by the Federal Communications Commission for airing the momentary indecency — allowing a lower court’s cancellation of the fine to stand, SCOTUSblog reports.

The 9/16th of a second of nudity led to a lengthy series of legal appeals and re-appeals. At the time, the FCC had a formal policy of imposing fines for even the most fleeting instances of indecent words or images. In line with that policy, the agency fined CBS $550,000 — the largest fine ever levied against a television broadcaster.

CBS appealed on grounds that the FCC seemed fairly capricious as to when and how it enforced its policy on indecency, and would even change it without notice. The Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found in CBS’s favor.

The Court announced today that it would bypass review of the case, allowing the Third Circuit’s ruling to stand. Chief Justice John Roberts filed a separate opinion stating that he did not believe the FCC had actually changed its policy.

Roberts added that he found Timberlake’s explanation that the nudity was simply a “wardrobe malfunction” unconvincing. The claim that the exposure was a mistake “strained the credulity of the public,” Roberts said.

In a related case, the Supreme Court ruled last week to throw out FCC fines against Fox News and ABC for fleeting instances of indecent language, finding that the networks had not had fair notice of the nature of the fines. The Court effectively sidestepped the issue of whether the fines violate free speech rights.

The controversial 2004 Super Bowl halftime show.

Found this graphic that totally relates to the PBS film.  Multitasking is such an important problem facing our students.  (And all of us.  I just turned off Pandora after reading this.  Oops.)

Found this graphic that totally relates to the PBS film.  Multitasking is such an important problem facing our students.  (And all of us.  I just turned off Pandora after reading this.  Oops.)

In class we watched this film—Parts 1: Distracted by Everything; Part 2: What’s it doing to their brains; Part 5: The Dumbest Generation

In class we watched this film—Parts 1: Distracted by Everything; Part 2: What’s it doing to their brains; Part 5: The Dumbest Generation

“All these computers, all these handhelds, all these cell phones, all these laptops, all these servers — what we’re getting out of all these connections is we’re getting one machine. … We’re constructing a single, global machine.” (Kevin Kelly—from his TedTalk—on the Next 5,000 Days of the Internet)